Effect of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles on Mechanical, Thermal and Biodegradability of Gelatin-Based Biocomposite Properties Films

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Biosystems Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, P.O. Box 9177948978, Mashhad, Iran

2 Academic Jahad of Mashhad, Department of Food Science, P.O.Box Mashhad, Iran

Abstract

Hypothesis: The basic limitation of biopolymers compared to the petroleum-based polymers is their weak physical and mechanical properties. In recent years, efforts have been made to properly incorporate nanoparticles into the polymer to reduce the limitation of their use in the packaging industry by partially improving the physical and mechanical properties of these films. This study aimed to incorporate zinc oxide nanoparticles into gelatin-biopolymer-based nanocomposite films, in order to improve their physical, mechanical and thermal properties.
Methods: Gelatin-based nanocomposite films were prepared by adding different amounts of zinc oxide nanoparticles (0, 0.5, 1.5 and 3%) using the so-called casting method. By performing several tests, different properties of the manufactured nanocomposite films including thickness, density, water vapor permeability, mechanical properties, degree of transparency, color properties and finally, their biodegradability were investigated.
Findings: the results showed that increasing the concentration of zinc oxide nanoparticles increased the tensile strength and decreased the elongation-at-break of this biofilm. The results of physical tests showed that increase in nanoparticles concentration reduced the permeability to water vapor from 0.76 to 0.48. Incorporating zinc oxide nanoparticles affected the transparency of the biofilms i.e. their transparency reduced by increasing nanoparticles concentration. By adding nanoparticles to gelatin-based films, thermal properties including glass transition temperature and melting temperature increased. Also, the thermal stability of the biofilms increased from 533.38°C (0.5% nanoparticles) to 559.53°C (1.5% nanoparticles). The results of biodegradability in soil and light showed that with increasing the concentration of nanoparticles, the biodegradability was reduced. This is mainly due to the addition of nanoparticles, which results in a greater bond strength between the components, and consequently the delay in biodegradation.

Keywords


1.Nafchi A.M., Moradpour M., Saeidi M., and Alias A.K., Effects of Nanorod-rich ZnO on Rheological, Sorption Isotherm, and Physicochemical Properties of Bovine Gelatin Films,   Lwt-Food Sci. Technol., 58, 142-149, 2014.
2.2. Krochta J. M. and Sothornvit R., Plasticizer Effect on Mechanical Properties of β-Lactoglobulin Films, J. Food Eng., 50,149-155, 2001.
3.Fomin V.A. and Guzeev V.V., Biodegradable Polymers, Their Present State and Future Prospects, Prog. Rubber Plast. Technol., 17, 186-, 2001.
4.Ghanbarzadeh B. and Oromiehi A.R., Thermal and Mechanical Behavior of Laminated Protein Films, J. Food Eng. (Persian), 90, 517-524, 2009.
5.Almasi H., Ghanbarzadeh B., and Antezami A.A., Production and Examination of Some Properties of Nanoclay Starch Nanocomposite Film, lran. J. Polym. Sci. Technol. (Persian), 22, 225-232, 2009.
6.Hernández O., Emaldi U., and Tovar J., In Vitro Digestibility of Edible Films from Various Starch Sources, Carbohydr. Polym., 71, 648-655, 2008.
7.Krochta J.M., Proteins as Raw Materials for Films and Coatings: Definitions, Current Status, and Opportunities, Protein-based Films and Coatings, CRC, Chapt. 1, 1-40, 2002.
8.Kalia S., Biodegradable Green Composites, John Wiley and Sons, 46, 360, 2016.
9.Bourtoom T. and Chinnan M.S., Preparation and Properties of Rice Starch–Chitosan Blend Biodegradable Film, LWT-Food Sci. Technol, 41, 1633-1641, 2008.
10.Ryu S.Y., Rhim J.W., Roh H.J., and Kim S.S., Preparation and Physical Properties of Zein-Coated High-Amylose Corn Starch Film,  Lwt-Food Sci. Technol, 35, 680-686, 2002.
11.Pereda M., Ponce A.G., Marcovich N.E., Ruseckaite R.A., and Martucci J.F., Chitosan-Gelatin Composites and Bi-Layer Films with Potential Antimicrobial Activity, Food Hydrocolloid., 25, 1372-1381, 2011.
12.Baldwin E.A., Hagenmaier R., and Bai J., Edible Coatings and Films to Improve Food Quality, CRC, 98, 120-448, 2011.
13.Tunç S. and Duman O., Preparation and Characterization of Biodegradable Methyl Cellulose/Montmorillonite Nanocomposite Films, Appl Clay Sci., 48, 414-424, 2010.
14.Mohammadi Nafchi A., Moradpour M., Saeidi M., and Alias A.K., Thermoplastic Starches: Properties, Challenges, and Prospects, Starch-Starke, 65, 61-72, 2013.
15.Vaseem M., Umar A., and Hahn Y.B., ZnO Nanoparticles: Growth, Properties, and Applications, Metal Oxide Nanostructures and Their Applications, 5, 1-36, 2010.
16.Hosseini A., Hijri Z., and Hosseini f., Investigation of the Effect of Oxidized Nanoparticles (ZnO) on the Physical and Mechanical Properties of Biodegradable Polyvinyl Alcohol Based Coating, National Conference on Food Science and Technology, Islamic Azad University of Shahrood, (Persian), 2014.
17.Noshirvani N., Ghanbarzadeh B., Mokarram R.R., Hashemi M., and Coma V., Preparation and Characterization of Active Emulsified Films Based on Chitosan-Carboxymethyl Cellulose Containing Zinc Oxide Nano Particles, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 99, 530-538, 2017.
18.Rhim J.W., Physical and Mechanical Properties of Water Resistant Sodium Alginate Films, Lwt-Food Sci Technol, 37, 323-330, 2004.
19.Müller C.M., Yamashita F., and Laurindo J.B., Evaluation of the Effects of Glycerol and Sorbitol Concentration and Water Activity on the Water Barrier Properties of Cassava Starch Films Through a Solubility Approach, Carbohydr. Polym., 72, 82-87, 2008.
20.Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Thin Plastic Sheeting, Annual Book of ASTM Standard, ASTM D20, 1995.
21.Standard Test Method for Water Vapor Transmission of Materials in Sheet Form, Annual Book of ASTM Standard, ASTM E 96-00, 2001.
22.Díaz‐Visurraga J., Melendrez M.F., Garcia A., Paulraj M., and Cardenas G., Semitransparent Chitosan‐TiO2 Nanotubes Composite Film for Food Package Applications, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 116, 3503-3515, 2010.
23.Yam K.L. and Papadakis S.E., A Simple Digital Imaging Method for Measuring and Analyzing Color of Food Surfaces, J. Food Eng., 61, 137-142, 2004.
24.Zardetto S. and Dalla Rosa M., Study of the Effect of Lamination Process on Pasta by Physical Chemical Determination and Near Infrared Spectroscopy Analysis, J. Food Eng., 74, 402-409, 2006.
25.Bolin H.R. and Huxsoll C.C., Control of Minimally Processed Carrot (Daucus carota) Surface Discoloration Caused by Abrasion Peeling, J. Food Sci., 56, 416-422, 1991.
26.Han J.H., Antimicrobial Food Packaging, Novel Food Packaging Techniques, 8, 50-70, 2003.
27.Shujun W., Jiugao Y., and Jinglin Y., Preparation and Characterization of Compatible and Degradable Thermoplastic Starch/Polyethylene Film, J. Polym. Environ., 14, 65-70, 2006.
28.Noushirvani N., Physical Properties of Polyvinyl Alcohol Starch Bionanocomposites Containing Nanocrystalline Cellulose and Nanoclay, MSc Thesis (Persian), University of Tabriz, Iran 2010.
29.Ramos Ó.L., Reinas I., Silva S.I., Fernandes J.C., Cerqueira M.A., Pereira R.N., and Malcata F.X., Effect of Whey Protein Purity and Glycerol Content Upon Physical Properties of Edible Films Manufactured Therefrom, Food Hydrocolloid., 30, 110-122, 2013.
30.Naeimian F., Khilo F., Sheikh N., and Akhavan A., Evaluation of Optical-Biological Degradation of Starch-Filled Polyethylene Films in Atmospheric Conditions of Tehran, lran. J. Polym. Sci. Technol. (Persian), 19, 377-385, 2006.
31.Muñoz-Fernandez L., Sierra-Fernandez A., Flores-Carrasco G., Milošević O., and Rabanal M. E., Solvothermal Synthesis of Ag/ZnO Micro/Nanostructures with Different Precursors for Advanced Photocatalytic Applications, Adv. Powder Technol., 28, 83-92, 2017.
32.Badiei E., Sangpour P., Bagheri M., and Pazuki M., Synthesis of Oxidized Nanoparticles Using Ionic Liquid and Evaluation of Its Antimicrobial Properties, National Conference on Nanotechnology Applications, (Persian), 2014.
33.Ghodsi M., Shahedi Bagh Khandan M., and Kadivr M., Investigation of the Physical and Preventive Properties of Cadmium Protein Bionanocomposite Containing Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles Produced by Abrasion Laser Method, The 21st National Congress of Food Science, Shiraz, (Persian), 2013.
34.Zhi C., Hu X., Jia X., Jin Z., and Miao M., Improving the Properties of Starch-Based Antimicrobial Composite Films Using ZnO-chitosan Nanoparticles, Carbohydr. Polym., 210,
204-209, 2019.
35.Youssef A.M., El-Sayed S.M., El-Sayed H.S., Salama H.H., and Dufresne A., Enhancement of Egyptian Soft White Cheese Shelf Life Using a Novel Chitosan/Carboxymethyl Cellulose/Zinc Oxide Bionanocomposite Film,   Carbohydr. Polym., 151, 9-19, 2016.
36.Kowalczyk M., Piorkowska E., Kulpinski P., and Pracella M., Mechanical and Thermal Properties of PLA Composites with Cellulose Nanofibers and Standard Size Fibers, Compos., Part A: Appl. Sci. Manuf., 42, 1509-1514, 2011.
37.Gharoy Ahangar E., Abbaspour‐Fard M.H., Shahtahmassebi N., Khojastehpour M., and Maddahi P., Preparation and Characterization of PVA/ZnO Nanocomposite, J. Food Process Pres., 39, 1442-1451, 2015.
38.Oun A.A. and Rhim W., Carrageenan-Based Hydrogels and Films: Effect of ZnO and CuO Nanoparticles on the Physical, Mechanical, and Antimicrobial Properties, Food Hydrocolloid., 67, 45-53, 2017.
39.Sadeghi K., Evaluation of the Physical and Antimicrobial Properties of Nanocomposite Containing Ethylene Vinyl Alcohol Chitosan and Nano-Zno, MSc Thesis, Isfahan University, Iran (Persian), 2013.
40.Shankar S., Teng X., Li G., and Rhim J.W., Preparation, Characterization, and Antimicrobial Activity of Gelatin/ZnO Nanocomposite Films, Food Hydrocolloid, 45, 264-271, 2015.
41.Paluszkiewicz C., Stodolak E., Hasik M., and Blazewicz M., FTIR Study of Montmorillonite-Chitosan Nanocomposite Materials, Spectrochim. Acta A, Mol. Biomol. Spectros., 2010. DOI:10.1016/j.saa.2010.08.053
42.Thein-Han W.W., Saikhun J., Pholpramoo C., Misra R.D. K., and Kitiyanant Y., Chitosan–Gelatin Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering: Physico-Chemical Properties and Biological Response of Buffalo Embryonic Stem Cells and Transfectant of GFP–Buffalo Embryonic Stem Cells, Acta Biomater, 5, 3453-3466, 2009.
43.Roy A.S., Gupta S., Sindhu S., Parveen A., and Ramamurthy P.C., Dielectric Properties of Novel PVA/ZnO Hybrid Nanocompositefilms, Compos. Eng., 47, 314-319, 2013.
44.Rahman P.M., Mujeeb V.A., Muraleedharan K., and Thomas S.K., Chitosan/Nano ZnO Composite Films: Enhanced Mechanical, Antimicrobial and Dielectric Properties, Arab J. Chem. 11, 120-127, 2016.
45.Chaudhary D.S., Understanding Amylose Crystallinity in Starch Clay Nanocomposites, J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Lett., Part B, 46, 979-987, 2008.
46.Ferfera‐Harrar H. and Dairi N., Elaboration of Cellulose Acetate Nanobiocomposites Using Acidified Gelatin‐Montmorillonite as Nanofiller: Morphology, Properties, and Biodegradation Studies, Polym Compos., 34, 1515-1524, 2013.
47.Dong H., Strawhecker K.E., Snyder J.F., Orlicki J.A., Reiner R.S., and Rudie A.W., Cellulose Nanocrystals as a Reinforcing Material for Electrospun Poly(methyl methacrylate) Fibers: Formation, Properties and Nanomechanical Characterization, Carbohydr. Polym., 87, 2488-2495, 2012.
48.Zoppe J.O., Peresin M.S., Habibi Y., Venditti R.A., and Rojas O.J., Reinforcing Poly(ε-caprolactone) Nanofibers with Cellulose Nanocrystals, ACS Appl Mater Int., 1, 1996-2004, 2009.
49.Kanmani P. and Rhim J.W., Physical, Mechanical and Antimicrobial Properties of Gelatin Based Active Nanocomposite Films Containing AgNPs and Nanoclay, Food Hydrocolloid., 35, 644-652, 2014.
50.Heidari A., Almasezadeh A., and Vosoughi M., Investigation of Biodegradability of Sodium Stannate Monte-Murillonite Nanocomposites Using Response Surface Method, Second Specialized Conference on Advanced Polymers (Persian), 2013.
51.Saburi n., Preparation of Enzyme and Thermal Degradation of Nano-Composite Film of Polyvinyl Alcohol-Starch-Carboxymethyl Cellulose Containing Nano-Particles of Sodium Montmorillonite, PhD Thesis, Tabriz University, Iran (Persian), 2014.