Study on the Effectiveness of Some Multicomponent Material Models with Hyper-viscoelasticity and Stress Softening for SBR/Carbon Black Compounds under two Loading Modes

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Department of Rubber Processing and Engineering, Faculty of Processing, Iran Polymer and Petrochemical Institute, P.O. Box 14975-112, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Hypothesis: Determination of the parameters of the material models for rubber compounds is usually carried out under simple modes such as uniaxial tension. These models are typically consisted of hyper-viscoelastic and stress-softening equations. However, due to the complicated behaviors of rubbery materials, the effectiveness and accuracy of such models under combined loads of tension, compression, and shear should be verified.
Methods: Three rubber compounds were prepared based on SBR reinforced by three different amounts of carbon blacks and underwent uniaxial cyclic under two loading/unloading rates and volumetric tests. The experimental data were used for the determination of parameters of three complex material models using a nonlinear curve fitting method. These models were selected based on the results of our previous findings. We have verified the uniaxial condition of the chosen test method and sample size using finite element method. The computed parameters were employed to simulate cylindrical rubber samples prepared from the same compounds through the finite element method using Abaqus code under compressive-contact loads. The predicted results were next compared with their experimentally measured data.
Findings: The results showed that the effectiveness of a material model in the prediction of stress-strain or stress-time behavior of a rubber compound under a simple load case does not necessarily guarantee that the same level of accuracy is obtained for the other loading modes, especially for highly filled compounds.  It is shown here that to obtain accurate results in such cases, in addition to hyper-viscoelastic and stress softening equations, the material model should include proper terms to consider the effect of the filler-filler interactions into account, especially for highly carbon black-loaded compounds. It is found that the best model is the one in which the viscoelastic behavior of the filler-filler structure is independently included.

Keywords


  1. Yeoh O.H., Characterization of Elastic Properties of Carbon-Black-Filled Rubber Vulcanizates, Rubber Chem. Technol., 63,792-805, 1990.
  2. Yeoh O.H., Some Forms of the Strain Energy Function for Rubber, Rubber Chem. Technol., 66, 754-771, 1993.
  3. Bergström J., Continuum Mechanics Foundations, Mechanics of Solid Polymers: Theory and Computational Modeling, Elsevier, San Diego, CA, USA, 131-207, 2015.
  4. Arruda E.M. and Boyce M.C., A Three-Dimensional Constitutive Model for the Large Stretch Behavior of Rubber Elastic Materials, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 41, 389-412, 1993.
  5. Marlow R.S., A General First-Invariant Hyperelastic Constitutive Model, Constitutive Models for Rubber, Swets and Zeitlinger B.V., Lisse, The Netherland, 157-160, 2003.
  6. Ghoreishy M.H.R., An Experimental and Numerical Verification of Different Hyperelastic Material Models for Rubbers Under Tension and Compression Loads, Iran. J. Polym. Sci. Technol. (Persian), 22, 273-284, 2009.
  7. Ghoreishy M.H.R., Determination of the Parameters of the Prony Series in Hyper-viscoelastic Material Models Using the Finite Element Method, Mater. Des., 35, 791-797, 2012.
  8. Carroll M.M., A Strain Energy Function for Vulcanized Rubbers, J. Elast., 103, 173-187, 2011.
  9. Melly S.K., Liu L., Liu Y., and Leng J., Improved Carroll’s Hyperelastic Model Considering Compressibility and Its Finite Element Implementation, Acta Mech. Sin., 37, 785-796, 2021.
  10. Carroll M.M., Molecular Chain Networks and Strain Energy Functions in Rubber Elasticity, Philos. Trans. Royal Soc. A, 377, 1-12, 2019.
  11. He H., Zhang Q., Zhang Y., Chen J., Zhang L., and Li F., A Comparative Study of 85 Hyperelastic Constitutive Models for Both Unfilled Rubber and Highly Filled Rubber Nanocomposite Material, Nano Mater. Sci., 4, 64-82, 2022.
  12. Melly S.K., Liu L., Liu Y., and Leng J., A Review on Material Models for Isotropic Hyperelasticity, Int. J. Mech. Syst. Dyn., 1, 71-88, 2021.
  13. Bergström J.S. and Boyce M.C., Constitutive Modeling of the Large Strain Time-Dependent Behavior of Elastomers, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 46, 931-954, 1998.
  14. Bergström J.S. and Boyce M.C., Large Strain Time-Dependent Behavior of Filled Elastomers, Mech. Mater., 32, 627-644, 2000.
  15. Ayoub G., Zaïri F., Naït-Abdelaziz M., and Gloaguen J-M., Modeling the Low-Cycle Fatigue Behavior of Visco-hyperelastic Elastomeric Materials Using a New Network Alteration Theory: Application to Styrene-Butadiene Rubber, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 59, 473-495, 2011.
  16. Ayoub G., Zaïri F., Naït-Abdelaziz M., Gloaguen J.M., and Kridli G., A Visco-hyperelastic Damage Model for Cyclic Stress-Softening, Hysteresis and Permanent Set in Rubber Using the Network Alteration Theory,  Int. J. Plast., 54, 19-33, 2014.
  17. Ghoreishy M.H.R. and Abbassi-Sourki F., Development of a New Combined Numerical/Experimental Approach for the Modeling of the Nonlinear Hyper-viscoelastic Behavior of Highly Carbon Black Filled Rubber Compound, Polym. Test., 70, 135-143, 2018.
  18. Ghoreishy M.H.R. and Abbassi-Sourki F., Study the Hyper-viscoelastic and Stress Softening Behaviors of Various SBR/CB Filled Compounds Using a Triple Model, Iran. J. Polym. Sci. Technol. (Persian), 33, 339-350, 2020.
  19. Ghoreishy M.H.R. and Abbassi Sourki F., Modeling the Hyperviscoelastic and Stress-Softening Behaviors of S-SBR/CB-Filled Rubber Compound Using a Multicomponent Model, Mech. Time-Depend Mater., 1-24, 2022. DOI:org/10.1007/s11043-022-09550-3
  20. Samaei S., Ghoreishy M.H.R., and Naderi G., Effects of SBR Molecular Structure and Filler Type on the Hyper-viscoelastic Behavior of SBR/BR Radial Tyre Tread Compounds Using a Combined Numerical/Experimental Approach, Iran. J. Polym. Sci. Technol. (Persian), 32, 65-78, 2019.
  21. Ghoreishy M.H.R. and Abbassi-Sourki F., Nonlinear Stress Relaxation of Filled Rubber Compounds: A New Theoretical Model and Experimental Investigation, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 138, 49884, 2021.
  22. Ogden R.W. and Roxburgh D.G., A Pseudo-Elastic Model for the Mullins Effect in Filled Rubber, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 455, 2861-2877, 1999.
  23. Ghoreishy M.H.R. and Abbassi-Sourki F., Development of a New Model Based on Ogden-Roxburgh Model for the Prediction of the Stress-Softening Behavior of Carbon Black-Filled Rubber Compounds, Iran. J. Polym. Sci. Technol. (Persian), 35, 69-82, 2022.
  24. Bergström J., Viscoplasticity Models, Mechanics of Solid Polymers: Theory and Computational Modeling, Elsevier, San Diego, CA, USA, 371-436, 2015.
  25. Lazeration J.J., Determination of the Coefficient of Friction of Rubber at Realistic Tire Contact Pressures, Rubber Chem. Technol., 60, 966-974, 1987.
  26. Abaqus, Simulia Corporation, Dassault Systemes, Providence, RI, USA, 2020.
  27. MCalibration, Veryst Engineering, Needham, MA, USA, 2020.
  28. Rao S.S., Engineering Optimization Theory and Practice, 4th ed., John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey, 2009.